Artificial Intelligence and Health
Artificial Intelligence and Health
Our faculty are examining the benefits and potential pitfalls of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health care and policy. They are investigating biases behind algorithms and the accuracy and transparency of machine learning, while studying ethical issues that arise as AI tools are integrated into hospital care, and exploring legal and regulatory strategies to protect patient safety, data privacy, and patients' and health-care practitioners' interests.
House Energy & Commerce Health Subcommittee on AI in U.S. Healthcare
Stanford Health Policy's Michelle Mello testifies in hearing about the opportunities to advance American health care through the use of AI technologies.
Health Equity and AI
Sherri Rose explains the importance of equity and fairness when using AI and machine learning tools to develop health-care platforms.
SHP Faculty Policy Briefs with Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence
Increasing Fairness in Medicare Payment Algorithms
The Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms
Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Health Plan Payments
Ethical Obligations to Inform Patients About Use of AI Tools
To help health care leaders and clinicians navigate the thorny terrain of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their testing and care, SHP's Michelle Mello and colleagues provide a framework for deciding what patients should be told about AI tools.
Read Story
Legal Risks and Rewards of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
Stanford Health Policy researchers address issues of liability risk and the ethical use of AI in health care, making the case for tools that address liability and risk—while making patient safety and concerns a priority.
Read Story
Integrating AI into Qualitative Analysis for Health Services Research
This AcademyHealth blog post by SHP's Sara Singer and colleagues explores the use of AI to enhance qualitative analysis for HSR, including challenges, questions for consideration, and assessing utility while models are still improving.
Read Story
Regulation of Health and Health Care Artificial Intelligence
In this JAMA Viewpoint, SHP's Michelle Mello discusses the paucity of formal regulations dealing with artificial intelligence in health care and what may lie ahead.
Read Story
How AI Diagnostic Tools Can Lead to Financial Burdens for Patients
According to the co-authors of a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the use of AI diagnostic tools by medical practitioners can lead to unexpected financial burdens for their patients.
Read Story
Policy Brief: The Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms
As policymakers, health-care practitioners, and technologists pursue the application of AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms in health care, this policy brief underscores the need for health equity research and highlights the limitations of employing technical “fixes” to address deep-seated health inequities.
Go To Brief
Developing Ethics in AI
Michelle Mello and colleagues are using award from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to build a practical, patient-centered method for ethical review of AI tools.
Read Story
TRIPOD+AI: Updated Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Prediction Models
Sherri Rose joins global network of health experts to improve the transparency and accuracy of prediction algorithms.
Read Story
Removing Race Adjustment in Chronic Kidney Disease Care
A new study led by Stanford Health Policy researchers finds that algorithmic changes to a chronic kidney disease care equation are likely insufficient to achieve health equity as many other structural inequities remain.
Read Story
The Safe Inclusion of Pediatric Data in AI-Driven Medical Research
AI algorithms often are trained on adult data, which can skew results when evaluating children. A perspective piece by SHP's Sherri Rose and several Stanford Medicine colleagues lays out an approach for pediatric populations.
Read Story
Using Artificial Intelligence Tools and Health Insurance Coverage Decisions
It would seem like AI would be a logical tool to help evaluate insurance coverage and claims. But results so far have been sobering, leading to class-action lawsuits and congressional committees demanding answers.
Read Story
Exploring Liability Risks of Using AI Tools in Patient Care
SHP's Michelle Mello and co-author analyzed more than 800 tort cases involving both AI and conventional software in health care and non-health-care contexts to see how decisions related to AI and liability might play out in the courts.
Read Story
AI Alone Will Not Reduce the Administrative Burden of Health Care
In this JAMA Network Viewpoint, Stanford Health Policy's Kevin Schulman and Perry Nielsen Jr. look at the impact Large Language Models could have on our complex health-care billing system.
Read Story