President Biden’s Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence—Implications for Health Care Organizations

President Biden’s Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence—Implications for Health Care Organizations

SHP's Michelle Mello and Stanford Medicine colleagues write in the journal JAMA that President Biden's recent executive order on Artificial Intelligence could have significant implications for health-care organizations.
Woman in health care looks at computer images Getty Images

 

President Joe Biden issued an executive order on Oct. 30 addressing his administration’s security concerns surrounding the dramatic rise of artificial intelligence — and proclaiming the technology must be governed.

“Artificial intelligence (AI) holds extraordinary potential for both promise and peril. Responsible AI use has the potential to help solve urgent challenges while making our world more prosperous, productive, innovative, and secure,” the order reads. “At the same time, irresponsible use could exacerbate societal harms such as fraud, discrimination, bias, and disinformation; displace and disempower workers; stifle competition; and pose risks to national security.” 

Though much of the executive order relates to cybersecurity and AI use in non-health care sectors, SHP’s Michelle Mello, a professor of health policy and professor of law, and her Stanford Medicine coauthors write in this JAMA viewpoint the executive order has several provisions that affect health-care organizations.  

“The order directs federal agencies to vigorously enforce existing laws to combat AI uses that constitute unfair or deceptive business practices, privacy violations, or discrimination,” writes Mello, PhD, JD; Nigam Shah, MBBS, PhD; and Danton Char, MD. “Given concerns about unfair applications of AI tools in health care delivery and insurance coverage, health care facilities and insurers could find themselves in the bullseye of law-enforcement efforts. Other cross-sectoral activities, such as promoting competition among AI developers and supporting workers through AI-related workforce disruptions, will also touch health care.”

The commentary reflects ongoing research to develop an ethical review process of AI in medicine, supported by a grant from the Stanford Institute for Human Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) and Stanford Health Care. 

Read the Full Viewpoint

Read More

AI and Medicine Illustration
Commentary

AI Alone Will Not Reduce the Administrative Burden of Health Care

In this JAMA Network Viewpoint, Stanford Health Policy's Kevin Schulman and Perry Nielsen Jr. look at the impact Large Language Models could have on our complex health-care billing system.
cover link AI Alone Will Not Reduce the Administrative Burden of Health Care
Halo over COVID vaccine bottle
Commentary

Accommodating Religious Objections to Vaccination Mandates

The Supreme Court decision concerning Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 raises new questions about the ability of private employers—including health-care organizations—to enforce vaccination requirements for employees who have religious objections. In this JAMA Health Forum commentary, Michelle Mello and colleagues consider the implications.
cover link Accommodating Religious Objections to Vaccination Mandates
Female Healthcare Worker Examines Baby with Stethoscope
Q&As

The Safe Inclusion of Pediatric Data in AI-Driven Medical Research

AI algorithms often are trained on adult data, which can skew results when evaluating children. A new perspective piece by SHP's Sherri Rose and several Stanford Medicine colleagues lays out an approach for pediatric populations.
cover link The Safe Inclusion of Pediatric Data in AI-Driven Medical Research