Global Health
Paragraphs

Background
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an important global health problem, and a
control strategy known as DOTS-Plus has existed since 1999. However, evidence regarding the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of DOTS-Plus is still limited.


Methodology/Principal Findings
We evaluated the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of a DOTS-Plus pilot project established at Makati Medical Center in Manila, the Philippines, in 1999. Patients with MDR-TB are treated with regimens, including first- and second-line drugs, tailored to their drug susceptibility pattern (i.e., individualised treatment). We considered the cohort enrolled between April 1999 and March 2002. During this three-year period, 118 patients were enrolled in the project; 117 were considered in the analysis. Seventy-one patients (61%) were cured, 12 (10%) failed treatment, 18 (15%) died, and 16 (14%) defaulted. The average cost per patient treated was US$3,355 from the perspective of the health system, of which US$1,557 was for drugs, and US$837 from the perspective of patients. The mean cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) gained by the DOTS-Plus project was US$242 (range US$85 to US$426).


Conclusions
Treatment of patients with MDR-TB using the DOTS-Plus strategy and individualised drug
regimens can be feasible, comparatively effective, and cost-effective in low- and middle-income countries.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
PLoS Medicine
Authors
Paragraphs

This issue of CHP/PCOR's quarterly newsletter, which covers news from the fall 2005 quarter, includes articles about:

  • a study concluding that the implantable cardioverter defibrillator -- one of the most expensive medical devices on the market -- is worth its high cost, in appropriate patients, because it prevents sudden cardiac deaths;
  • the evolution and broad application of the Quality Indicators, a set of practical tools developed by CHP/PCOR researchers that are used by hundreds of U.S. hospitals, medical groups, health insurers, state health agencies and business coalitions to screen for quality problems;
  • a study finding that the Internet can be a valuable tool to help patients with stigmatized illnesses (such as mental illness) find information about and seek treatment for their illness;
  • CHP/PCOR-hosted seminars on global health themes, given by Jack Chow of the World Health Organization -- who discussed combating malaria, TB and HIV/AIDS -- and Dean Jamison of the NIH's Fogarty International Center, who discussed evaluating countries' performance on health; and
  • a prestigious national award won by two CHP/PCOR trainees at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Newsletters
Publication Date
Authors

Encina Commons Room 101,
615 Crothers Way,
Stanford, CA 94305-6006

(650) 723-2714 (650) 723-1919
0
Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Professor
Professor, Health Policy
Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies
Senior Fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research
Professor, Economics (by courtesy)
grant_miller_vert.jpeg PhD, MPP

As a health and development economist based at the Stanford School of Medicine, Dr. Miller's overarching focus is research and teaching aimed at developing more effective health improvement strategies for developing countries.

His agenda addresses three major interrelated themes: First, what are the major causes of population health improvement around the world and over time? His projects addressing this question are retrospective observational studies that focus both on historical health improvement and the determinants of population health in developing countries today. Second, what are the behavioral underpinnings of the major determinants of population health improvement? Policy relevance and generalizability require knowing not only which factors have contributed most to population health gains, but also why. Third, how can programs and policies use these behavioral insights to improve population health more effectively? The ultimate test of policy relevance is the ability to help formulate new strategies using these insights that are effective.

Faculty Fellow, Stanford Center on Global Poverty and Development
Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center for Latin American Studies
Faculty Affiliate, Woods Institute for the Environment
Faculty Affiliate, Interdisciplinary Program in Environment & Resources
Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions
CV
Date Label

The Global Health Productivity project is a Stanford-led network of collaborators from 20 developed nations organized to assess the impact of healthcare regulation, financing and organization on healthcare delivery and health system performance. The project studies diverse issues of global interest, including pharmaceutical regulation, policies regarding financing the care of elderly individuals with dementia, and approaches to managing common clinical problems such as congestive heart failure.

Subscribe to Global Health