Health and Medicine

FSI’s researchers assess health and medicine through the lenses of economics, nutrition and politics. They’re studying and influencing public health policies of local and national governments and the roles that corporations and nongovernmental organizations play in providing health care around the world. Scholars look at how governance affects citizens’ health, how children’s health care access affects the aging process and how to improve children’s health in Guatemala and rural China. They want to know what it will take for people to cook more safely and breathe more easily in developing countries.

FSI professors investigate how lifestyles affect health. What good does gardening do for older Americans? What are the benefits of eating organic food or growing genetically modified rice in China? They study cost-effectiveness by examining programs like those aimed at preventing the spread of tuberculosis in Russian prisons. Policies that impact obesity and undernutrition are examined; as are the public health implications of limiting salt in processed foods and the role of smoking among men who work in Chinese factories. FSI health research looks at sweeping domestic policies like the Affordable Care Act and the role of foreign aid in affecting the price of HIV drugs in Africa.

Paragraphs

Abstract

Context: The Closing the Quality Gap seriesfrom the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality summarizes evidence for eight high-priority health care topics: outcomes used in disability research, bundled payment programs, public reporting initiatives, health care disparities, palliative care, the patient-centered medical home, prevention of health care-associated infections, and medication adherence.
Objective: To distill evidence from this series and provide insight into the “state of the science” of quality improvement (QI).
Methods: We provided common guidance for topic development and qualitatively synthesized evidence from the series topic reports to identify cross-topic themes, challenges, and evidence gaps as related to QI practice and science.
Results: Among topics that examined effectiveness of QI interventions, we found improvement in some outcomes but not others. Implementation context and potential harms from QI activities were not widely evaluated or reported, although market factors appeared important for incentive-based QI strategies. Patient-focused and systems-focused strategies were generally more effective than clinician-focused strategies, although the latter approach improved clinician adherence to infection prevention strategies. Audit and feedback appeared better for targeting professionals and organizations, but not patients. Topic reviewers observed heterogeneity in outcomes used for QI evaluations, weaknesses in study design, and incomplete reporting.
Conclusions: Synthesizing evidence across topics provided insight into the state of the QI field for practitioners and researchers. To facilitate future evidence synthesis, consensus is needed around a smaller set of outcomes for use in QI evaluations and a framework and lexicon to describe QI interventions more broadly, in alignment with needs of decision makers responsible for improving quality.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
Perm J
Authors
Paragraphs

The United States devotes significant resources for the provision of health care, yet quality is often elusive or lacking. In 2004, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality launched a collection of evidence reports to bring data to bear on quality improvement (QI) opportunities. This new series, Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science, consists of eight reports that continue the focus on improving the quality of health care through critical assessment of relevant evidence for selected settings, interventions, and clinical conditions. This report is an introduction to the Executive Summaries of the eight reports in the series and summarizes elements across the series for readers.

http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/gapsumtp.html

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Authors

School of Medicine
1265 Welch Road, x115
Stanford, CA 94305-5415

Mail code: 5414

(650) 725-9933
0
Associate Professor of Pediatrics (Neonatology) at the Lucille Salter Packard Children's Hospital
JProfit_professional_picture_(3).jpg MD, MPH

My primary research interest is the effect of health system design on quality of care and outcomes for sick newborns. My work involves research of patient and families, clinical work areas, hospital, and health system structures. This includes health care delivery design at the macro-system level as well as organizational context at the hospital and neonatal intensive care unit level. In addition, I am interested in the use of information technology to support families, care professionals, and policy makers in their efforts to provide optimal care to sick infants.

Stanford Health Policy Associate
CV

CHP/PCOR
Encina Commons, Room 178
615 Crothers Way
Stanford, CA 94305-6019

(650) 723-1919
0
shilpa_tight.jpg
Project Manager at the Center for Health Policy and the Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research

117 Encina Commons, room 213
Stanford, CA 94305

(650) 723-2217 (650) 723-1919
0
VA Health Services Research and Development Fellow at the Center for Health Policy and the Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research
p1010259.jpg MD, MPH
Assistant Professor, Medicine

Encina Commons Room 225,
615 Crothers Way,
Stanford, CA 94305-6006

(650) 723-0970 (650) 723-1919
0
Vice Provost and Dean of Research
Professor, Health Policy
Professor, Law
rsd15_081_0469a.jpg LLB, ScD, MPH

David M. Studdert is a leading expert in the fields of health law and empirical legal research. His scholarship explores how the legal system influences the health and well-being of populations. A prolific scholar, he has authored more than 150 articles and book chapters, and his work appears frequently in leading international medical, law, and health policy publications.

Professor Studdert joined Stanford Law School faculty on November 1, 2013, in a joint appointment as Professor of Health Policy at the Stanford University School of Medicine, and Professor of Law.

Before joining the Stanford faculty, Professor Studdert was on the faculty at the University of Melbourne (2007-13) and the Harvard School of Public Health (2000-06). He has also worked as a policy analyst at the RAND Corporation, a policy advisor to the Minister for Health in Australia, and a practicing attorney.

Professor Studdert has received the Alice S. Hersh New Investigator Award from AcademyHealth, the leading organization for health services and health policy research in the United States. He was awarded a Federation Fellowship (2006) and a Laureate Fellowship (2011) by the Australian Research Council. He holds a law degree from University of Melbourne and a doctoral degree in health policy and public health from the Harvard School of Public Health.

CV
Date Label
Subscribe to Health and Medicine