Stanford Health Policy is a joint effort of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and the Stanford School of Medicine
FSI’s researchers assess health and medicine through the lenses of economics, nutrition and politics. They’re studying and influencing public health policies of local and national governments and the roles that corporations and nongovernmental organizations play in providing health care around the world. Scholars look at how governance affects citizens’ health, how children’s health care access affects the aging process and how to improve children’s health in Guatemala and rural China. They want to know what it will take for people to cook more safely and breathe more easily in developing countries.
FSI professors investigate how lifestyles affect health. What good does gardening do for older Americans? What are the benefits of eating organic food or growing genetically modified rice in China? They study cost-effectiveness by examining programs like those aimed at preventing the spread of tuberculosis in Russian prisons. Policies that impact obesity and undernutrition are examined; as are the public health implications of limiting salt in processed foods and the role of smoking among men who work in Chinese factories. FSI health research looks at sweeping domestic policies like the Affordable Care Act and the role of foreign aid in affecting the price of HIV drugs in Africa.
Symposium
Clinical and billing data were collected on all admissions to six California newborn intensive care units during a 6-month period. Charges were adjusted to costs using Medicaid cost to charge ratios and for inflation, and patients were classified by the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. Costs were from 97% to 708% more than the proposed DRG reimbursement levels. Regression analysis showed that DRGs explained 22% of the variation in costs. An alternative model using binary variables to control for birth weight, assisted ventilation, surgery, survival, multiple births, and mode of discharge explained 42% of the variation in costs. In contrast to other proposed DRG alternatives, this simple model does not require special training or subjective decision-making.
Questions of equity and efficiency have always plagued our national health-care system. Not all the billions spent in this area go for actual restoration of health. Many of the expenditures are for various procedures, tests, prescriptions, etc., that may or may not be necessary. How can we determine the optimum system of health care? Fuchs thinks that the application of the principles of economics can help in arriving at the right mix of market competition, government regulation, and professional control. He also devotes special attention to the impact of the increasing number of programs in health education and promotion. A topical analysis, which should be required reading for policymakers. Recommended for academic and large public libraries. - M. Balachandran, Univ. of Illinois Lib., Urbana-Champaign